TEPwiki:Pages for discussion/File:Nassad.jpg: Difference between revisions

From TEPwiki, Urth's Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Should be forwarded to community moderation, if found to be breaking TEP rules then delete. [[User:Asmo|Asmo]] ([[User talk:Asmo|talk]]) 05:02, 9 August 2023 (CDT)
Should be forwarded to community moderation, if found to be breaking TEP rules then delete. [[User:Asmo|Asmo]] ([[User talk:Asmo|talk]]) 05:02, 9 August 2023 (CDT)

Come on, this is a Nazi symbol which replaces a swastika with the Star of David and a menorah. It’s clearly antisemitic. I don’t think we even need to run it by community moderation. It breaks TEP rules, but it also breaks RP and Wiki rules, doesn’t it? Wiki admins have the authority to delete a page anyway, right? Besides, what possible defense could there be? It’s entirely irrelevant to Urth, as it is used by a noncanon country run by an absent user and uses symbols not canon to Urth in any capacity as far as I’m aware. There’s not even a counterargument to be made. --[[User:Lerasi|Lerasi]] ([[User talk:Lerasi|talk]]) 11:05, 9 August 2023 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:05, 9 August 2023

File:Nassad.jpg

File:Nassad.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Suggested by Norgs. Non-canon, and... interesting design choices for the eagle. --Tretrid (talk) 22:13, 8 August 2023 (CDT)

Should be forwarded to community moderation, if found to be breaking TEP rules then delete. Asmo (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2023 (CDT)

Come on, this is a Nazi symbol which replaces a swastika with the Star of David and a menorah. It’s clearly antisemitic. I don’t think we even need to run it by community moderation. It breaks TEP rules, but it also breaks RP and Wiki rules, doesn’t it? Wiki admins have the authority to delete a page anyway, right? Besides, what possible defense could there be? It’s entirely irrelevant to Urth, as it is used by a noncanon country run by an absent user and uses symbols not canon to Urth in any capacity as far as I’m aware. There’s not even a counterargument to be made. --Lerasi (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2023 (CDT)