TEPwiki:Pages for discussion/Nacata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Another one of Rico's nations. Again, we should decide whether it's worth preserving or whether we should delete it. --[[User:Tretrid|Tretrid]] ([[User talk:Tretrid|talk]]) 21:48, 8 August 2023 (CDT) |
Another one of Rico's nations. Again, we should decide whether it's worth preserving or whether we should delete it. --[[User:Tretrid|Tretrid]] ([[User talk:Tretrid|talk]]) 21:48, 8 August 2023 (CDT) |
||
Pages for nations made non-canon due to inactivity should be archived and their original pages redirected to the Archive: namespace. As a blanket rule, there is never any downside or cost to archiving, so it's always worth it to preserve. Deletion is reserved for pages that break TEP rules. [[User:Asmo|Asmo]] ([[User talk:Asmo|talk]]) 05:06, 9 August 2023 (CDT) |
* Pages for nations made non-canon due to inactivity should be archived and their original pages redirected to the Archive: namespace. As a blanket rule, there is never any downside or cost to archiving, so it's always worth it to preserve. Deletion is reserved for pages that break TEP rules. [[User:Asmo|Asmo]] ([[User talk:Asmo|talk]]) 05:06, 9 August 2023 (CDT) |
||
Latest revision as of 12:37, 9 August 2023
Nacata
Another one of Rico's nations. Again, we should decide whether it's worth preserving or whether we should delete it. --Tretrid (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2023 (CDT)
- Pages for nations made non-canon due to inactivity should be archived and their original pages redirected to the Archive: namespace. As a blanket rule, there is never any downside or cost to archiving, so it's always worth it to preserve. Deletion is reserved for pages that break TEP rules. Asmo (talk) 05:06, 9 August 2023 (CDT)