Queendom of Lapérouse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{Infobox former country|demonym=Lapérousian|conventional_long_name=Queendom of Lapérouse|common_name=Lapérouse|native_name=Royaume de Lapérouse|motto=Frakanic Pour Odin, Nous Endurons et Persévérons|royal_anthem=Fólkvangr|capital=Batkong|official_languages=Frakanic|religion=Imperial Ulvriktru </br> Duarism <br> Akuanism </br> Sinhadranhists|currency=Imperial Krone; Lapérousian Krone|esta...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 25:
== Society ==
Arguments over the Queendom's status as a monoculture or multicultural has been on going in historical review since the 1890s. Arguments for monoculture state the point towards the Queendom extremist religious enforcement policies, the kemonomimi supremacy and enforcement of a Lapérousian. In the cases of religious and cultural minorities, it was done out political necessities and outside of the Sinhadranhists it was limited to people of the Sagas IE [[Duarism|Duarist]] and [[Akuanism|Akuanists]]. While those who argue that Lapérousian culture was always multicultural, while religious puritan beliefs and Kemonomimi supremacy was the rule. The Queendom was plentiful in terms of ethnic groups regardless albeit majority of them being [[Ulvriktru]] Kemonomimi, people of the Sagas was allowed unparalleled rights and while they couldn't reach noble ranks of Jarlnja, they was given protections and treated the same as any other Lapérousian would be. However both sides of the argument, agree that the Queendom constructed numerous public monuments, communal spaces and infrastructure to establish sense of Lapérousness in the population. Through the reasoning about it heavily is debated between the two sides.
Lapérousian society social-political hierarchy was far more malleable than other contemporary societies provided the person was born a woman. If one was a [[Ulvriktru]] Kemonomimi woman, then it was possible from a lowly thrall to raise to the ranks to become a Jarlnja and then their children to fall down the ranks just as quickly. Thrall that could earn significant amount of wealth, could easily become freed by their owner due to the perception that the thrall has, for the lack of a better word seize their freedom and proved their value in society to be higher. Meanwhile a noble who has earned the same amount of wealth as the thrall would be seen lesser and could easily lose their noble titles or standing as it was seen they failing/acting more as a peasant than a noble by earn that.
== Government and Military ==
| |||