Carriers of Mercy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 59:
The Carriers of Mercy after it officially declared it's independence from the Packilvanian Communist Party was administered by the Supreme Council. The Supreme Council consisted of members that had last been elected in 1970. It adopted temporary provisions for the duration of the war whereby elections were suspended. Additionally if a member died, resigned or was declared incapacitated (by majority vote of the Supreme Council), they body could co-opt more members. Members could also be removed by a majority vote of the Supreme Council. The Supreme Council could appoint and dismiss the Supreme Leader by three quarters vote, but it never did so throughout the war. The Supreme Council had supreme judicial, executive, military, and legislative authority over the Carriers of Mercy. It vested most of the power for running the daily affairs of the organisation and overseeing the war effort to the Supreme Leader. Some of its members were heads of divisions and administered specialised areas of the functioning of the body. Despite a few members who vacated their seats for various reasons, the body largely remained unchanged since the Second Packilvanian Civil War began. The body ratified the Interim Constitution of Packilvania following the end of the war and the dissolution of the Carriers of Mercy.
 
The body throughout its life comprised of around 150 members however most of the decisions were made by the Standing Committee of the Supreme Councils which was chaired by the Supreme CouncilsLeader and which de facto consisted of heads of divisions and made most tacticalmajor decisions. Strategic decisions that fell outside of the administration of the war such as the dissolution of the organisation were adopted by a quorate sitting of the Plenum of the Supreme Council (i.e., all its members) and it was chaired by the Chairman of the Supreme CouncilsCouncil who organised sittings of the body either as mandated by its procedures or as requested by the Standing Committee. It was only mandated to meet once a month, meetings which struggled to reach quorum due to the vast distances and logistical issues that the organisation faced however members could appoint proxies to vote and deliberate on their behalf which was usually other members. This enabled more senior members to exercise disproportionate influence because that had proxy for several members who were unable to attend.
 
The Standing Committee of the Supreme Council consisted of members of the Supreme Council who were heads of divisions as well as the Supreme Leader and the Chairman of the Supreme Council. The Standing Committee made most decisions and met weekly. It consisted of 18 members. The Supreme Leader presided over its sessions and guided its activities and policies. With the Supreme Leader accumulating considerable influence and the development of a cult of personality around him, the Supreme Council morphed into a de facto rubber stamp for his decisions and the Standing Committee rarely voted against his decisions, resulting in the Standing Committee turning into a deliberative rather than decision-making body such that while members had oversight of their respective portfolios, the Supreme Leader made decisions for general matters.
Line 66:
 
The Divisions of the Carriers of Mercy were focused more around managing the organisation in a war time structure. Many functions that had nothing to do with the war were delegated to various offices and agencies while those concerning combat, security, and stability had divisional heads. The Heads of Divisions were as follows:
 
*
* Head of Intelligence and Internal Security
* Head of Manpower and Discipline
Line 87 ⟶ 85:
In areas that the Carriers of Mercy took over and controlled, they typically placed combatants under arrest and placed them in labour camps. Civilian officials often retained their jobs to the extent that their jobs were relevant to the exercise of basic functions required for daily life and for which there were no members of the Carriers of Mercy identified who could fulfil those roles. The policy was to place at least one member of the Carriers of Mercy in positions of control and leadership to ensure that the administrative institutions of the places that they conquered were subservient to the Carriers of Mercy. Many Party Secretaries and other officials who were principally political appointees were removed from their positions and arrested. Because these areas were technically under military occupation, all the law was exercised by military tribunal under the Carriers of Mercy Military Criminal Code.
 
The Military Criminal Code was a set of laws that formed the basis of the military disciplinary and judicial system. Most matters which were considered crimes were adjudicated by a member of the army of the rank of Captain while a few members of the community who were trusted to the extent that this was ascertainable would advise on the crime. The Warriors of Mercy Gendarmerie was responsible for exercising basic policing functions. Generally, civilian police institutions were placed under the control of the Warriors of Mercy Gendarmerie.
 
== Military ==
verified
5,329

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu