International Convention on Climate Change: Difference between revisions

{{Infobox treaty|name=International Convention on Climate Change|image=If_flag.png|type=Treaty|context=Climate change mitigation|location_signed=[[Rilanon]], [[Christie Island]]|date_effective={{Start date and age|2022|8|3}}|negotiators=Various|signatories=[[International Forum]]|language=[[Staynish]]}}

On 1 July 2022, Olav Brodzki of [[LasówkraniaKorćetta]] proposed that an international Environmental Protection Agency should be established. Ambassador Windfross of [[Cryria]] urged him for more detailed. Antoli Smorin of [[Mexregiona]] expressed interest given the threats to his country from melting polar ice caps in the [[Rotantic Ocean]]. Eirin Slovry of [[Nystatiszna]] suggested that climate change was irreversible and that the agency should provide monetary compensation to the most severely affected nations. Imo Naro of [[Reijia]] supported granting funds but urged that strict limits on these disbursements should be implemented. Brozki emphasised the importance of prevention. Slovkry intimated that prevention would stifle economic progress in the developing world. Brozky then contended that the efforts should be targeted at developed nations. Reijia refused to support an agreement that did not have universal greenhouse gas emissions limits. Jwala of [[Serramal]] intimated that developed countries were trying to enjoy the fruits of the climate change they induced while keeping the developing world down. Brodzki suggested supporting the developing world in meeting carbon emission targets.

Qatun of [[Älemsi Negdel]] supported the initial emissions targets and funding proposals. Revas MaroataMaraota of [[Auravas]] concurred. [[Prince Faijil]] of [[Packilvania]] disputed the claims made by the Malordian and Kaerznian ambassadors, stating that per capita emissions were unevenly distributed. While agreeing with spirit of the message raised by Slovkry and others that developing nations were unfairly affected, he also added that renewable power was unreliable and could not adequately form the base of an electrical grid and further added that countries which conducted cheap manufacturing and resource extractive industries such as Packilvania were simply vehicles for the rich nations to outsource their emissions that they would otherwise have borne had they onshored these industries. He also contended that the Kaerznian ambassador was presenting a eugenisistic approach citing the ethnic cleansing policies of the [[Packilvanian Communist Party]] as the crux of his antipathy for population control measures. Turnbull of [[Oscrelia]] agreed with the Prince and supported resource control measures.

Marsudi added that data collection, interpretation and communication on climate issues should added to the purview of the EPA, sentiments that Prince Faijil supported. He then added supported for funding to poorer nations. Verni Cent sugegsted that new EPA should give special attention and provide special representation for small island nations susceptible to drowning. Faijil suggestedf reducing this to a specialised advisory role. Widfross disagreed vehemently with Verni Cent. Molebaai of [[Vistaraland]]Maraota suggested that scientists should be at the helm of the new agencies decision making process. Turnbull urged the organization to keep a global context in mind, sentiments that Alexis del Santos of [[South Hills]] shared. Lev Janssen of [[K'undzeti]] supported VistariAuravasi proposals for the agency to be more facilitative than punitive or top-down. Aivintis also felt that climate change did not affect them and thus it was broadly not their problem, sentiments that Qatun rebutted adamantly. Marsudi suggested tagetting the top largest poilluting companies instead of countries.

The discussion broke down and ambassadors became disheartened but Prince Faijil stated that Packilvania would pledge to cut emissions by 30% by 20162060 in good faith and to encourage other nations to do the same. To direction to the discussion and something solid to vote on Packilvania presented the first draft which focused on setting targets, issuing fines and giving the agency an advisory and monitoring focus. Contentions about using the [[Packilvanian dinar]] to measure fines emerged among member states causing the treaty to focus solely on [[Kirib]] and Standard Hawking Dollar denominated fines.