Tivot Sandwich: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Rivendale" to "Ribenstadt"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m (Text replacement - "Rivendale" to "Ribenstadt")
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
[[Category:Oan's links]] [[Category:Salovia]]
[[Tivot Sandwich|'''Tivot Sandwich''']] is a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax tool. This is an accounting and finance term that refers to the legal framework enabling companies to reduce their tax burden. They do this by exploiting the legal framework of [[Tivot]] and - more broadly - the [[United Nations of the Auroran Continent]] more broadly. It was originally developed by Governor [[Eliri Drzevili]] of Tivot following independence from [[Salovia]]. andThey enlisted the advice of [[Edwin Ita]] ofand the[[Kaha Marama]] of [[Ita Marama]] (an audit and accounting agency originating from [[the Oan Isles]]). asIt an adviser towas the governmentvision of TivotDrzevili to helptransform the countryTivot becomeinto a majorglobal financial centercentre.
 
Originally it built on the core strengths of Tivot as a nation such as political stability, proximity to major markets and its strong transshipment industry. Furthermore, through the [[Auroran Continental Assembly]], the country was able to gain greater access to the markets of the [[Aurora|Auroran]] continent. Although Aurora experienced tumultuous situations namely the [[Auroran-Pacific War]], the treaties and laws of the Auroran Continental Assembly were carried over to the UNAC, enabling the country to become a major financial centre and itin turn cement the Tivot Sandwich. Although other countries have BEPS tools, they do not have the geography, history, politics and, legal system and geopolitical clout to accomplish what Tivot achieved with the Tivot Sandwich.
 
== History ==
Following the [[Posolic Wars]], the Grand Republic of [[Salovia]] in 1834 was recognised as an independent and legitimate state. Tivot was a province of this new nation. Thus, Tivot's political and legal systems and economic structure developed in the context of being part of Salovia. Under [[List of Chancellors of Salovia|Grand Chancellors]] [[Mikhail Karanovi]] and (his successor) [[Orev Saloko]], the government of Salovia began rebuilding infrastructure and establishing institutional mechanisms for the functioning of the state. Their policies rebuilt the economy of Salovia. The effect of their policies was felt throughout the nation including in Tivot. Infrastructure such as the Port of Triklov werewas repaired and expanded. Coupled with trade treaties with nations such as [[Ayaupia]], [[Puntalia]] and [[Lapimuhyo]], Tivot became a hub for Salovian trade with the outside world, developing a reputation as a transshipment centre. In becoming a major transshipment centre, the nation laid the foundations to become a major financial centre in the years to follow.
 
The [[Auroran Imperial War]] broke out in 1970 and lasted until 1975 between the Bursil Accords and the RivendaleRibenstadt Pact. As part of Salovia (which was part of the Bursil Accords), Tivot benefited from the influx of skilled workers, companies and increased trade relatiowithrelations with other Bursil Accords member nations such as [[Great Morstaybishlia]]. Furthermore, most of the action took place far from Tivot, allowing it to remain relatively stable and prosperous. After the Auroran Imperial War, the Tivotian Governor [[Eliri Drzevili]] announced the province's intent to hold an independence referendum on their status. Despite Salovia declaring secession to be illegal, the referendum was held on October 23rd, 1975 alongside [[Blueacia]], and on January 1st, 1976, the nation was founded with the backing of Salovia's rival powers [[Ethalria (Grand Matriarchy)|Ethalria]] and Great Morstaybishlia (despite the fact that they were oneon the same side during the AIW).
 
Declaring independence allowed Tivot to escape the ravgesravages of the decades-long [[Salovian Civil War]] that ensued shortly after the AIW. In a bid to cement its role as a global financial centre and to disentangle its economic fortunes from the quagmire of Salovia, now-Chief Executive Drzevili, enlisted the help of [[Ita Marama]], an Oan auditing firm to develop the policy mechanisms that would make Tivot attractive to foreign nations. Edwin Ita and Kaha Marama proposed the following policies:
* '''Modernisation''': Tivot had to modernise its taxation, intellectual property (IP) and company legislation to bring it in alignment with Auroran nations such as Great Morstaybishlia.
* '''Liberalisation''': Tivot was to make it as easy as possible for foreigners to start and operate companies in the country. This included lowering the time and costs involved in registering a business, getting an address and opening a bank account among others. Furthermore, corporate taxes were to be lowered and companies would have more discretion over their internal records.
Line 16 ⟶ 17:
These policies laid the groundwork for the Tivot Sandwich. But the full potency of the Tivot Sandwich arose when Tivot joined the [[Auroran Continental Assembly]]. The ACA lowered trade barriers and facilitated the easy movement of people, goods and services. Companies and high net worth individuals looking to lower onshore taxation expenses started looking to tax havens to avoid these taxes.
 
In the process, two classes of tax havens (more accurately known as offshore financial centres or OFCs) emerged: sink OFCs and conduit OFCs. Sink OFCs were the final destinations for shifted profits because of their highly opaque business practices and virtually non-existent tax rates. Countries such as [[Blueacia]], [[Frorkstolm]] and the [[NECRATIESNecraties Islands]] fulfilled this function. However, because the modern financial system was becoming even more complicated and policymakers were wary of these tax havens, many of them struggled to sign the treaties needed to shift corporate tax liabilities easily.
 
Thus, Tivot positioned itself as a conduit OFC between onshore tax jurisdictions and sink OFCs. Due to its international reputation and the careful work of building its institutional mechanisms starting with Chief Executive Eliri Dzrevili, Tivot was able to gain the trust needed to enter into corporate tax liability treaties with both onshore and offshore jurisdictions. Tivot developed a highly sophisticated structure that involved taxation, company and IP law to develop the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax tools that came to be known as the Tivot Sandwich.
 
The country maintained a policy of avoiding military, political and economic conflict and maintaining commerce with as many nations as possible, further building its trust. During the [[Auroran-Pacific War]], Aurora was divided between the RivendaleRibenstadt Pact and the Bursil Alliance. To both ensure the neutrality of the [[Auroran Central Bank]] and to protect it from the fighting taking place between Ethalria and Great Morstaybishlia, it was moved to [[Tivot]] where it remained. Despite being nominally part of the Bursil Alliance, the reality was that Tivot was a neutral financial broker. This proximity to the ACJ and the practical neutrality that this created, Tivot banks were able to act as conduits for taxes between warring states, further cementing the relevance and necessity of Tivot as a conduit OFC especially for Frorkstolm and the Necraties Islands which were overseas dependencies of Great Morstaybishlia and were thus subject to embargoes and sanctions by RivendaleRibenstadt Pact member states.
 
==Overview of tax, company and property law==
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
The Republic of Tivot is a member state of the UNAC and is thus subject to the laws of the UNAC insofar as these laws are applicable to it. Thus, it also accepts the jurisdiction of the ACJ. The legislative branch of Tivot consists of the elected National Senate. It passes laws which are in turn executed by the executive branch composed of the Chief Executive and other executive officials.
 
Tivot law shares many of the features of taxation, company and IP law described in the previous section (refer to the section on [[Tivot Sandwich#Overview of taxationtax, company and property law|Overview of taxation, company and property law]] for more information). Tivot's corporate tax rates are some of the lowest in the UNAC and is one of the easiest countries in the UNAC to establish a company. Tivot also protects the privacy of juristic and natural persons, enabling juristic persons to conceal a lot of information about their internal operations, beneficial owners (natural persons who are the ultimate beneficiaries of the company) and financial transactions from the public and foreign governments. Furthermore, the government of Tivot tries to ask as little information from companies as possible.
 
==Mechanisms of the Tivot Sandwich==
===First layer===
A legal person will establish a holding company in Tivot. This company will take ownership of a controlling stake in an onshore child company. The child company is the main company that operates in an onshore jurisdiction. The holding company will make some form of loan to the child company. The value of this loan will be greater than or equal to the total profits that the child company has made. The loan repayments by reducing the profit also reduce the taxable income. Thus, this reduces the total corporate income tax paid by the child company to the tax authorities of the onshore jurisdiction. Because the holding company is located in Tivot it is charged taxes in Tivot despite the fact that the "interest income" it made from its child company originates from an onshore destination.
 
This is where the "no double tax" rule comes into effect. Only one jurisdiction enforces the tax. Because the holding company is located in Tivot, it pays taxes to the Tivot tax authorities. Because Tivot charges low taxes, the holding company pays very low taxes on the income generated from the child company.
===Second layer===
The child company may undertake research and development activities in the onshore jurisdiction which generate intellectual property (IP). This IP is then filed at a patent office. If the patent office recognises the IP, then it is also recognised in Tivot. The child company can then use the IP to create goods and services for sale. Furthermore, it can also rent the IP to other companies for royalties or it can outright sell the IP to other entities.
 
The problem is that if it sells the IP, the child company will get income. This income will be charged capital gains tax. If the child company gets royalties from the sale of this IP, they will be charged corporate income tax. Thus, the child company can pay the holding company for the loan in the first layer of the sandwich using IP instead of cash.
 
This fulfills two functions. Firstly, all the rent and capital gains from the IP will go to the holding company which will boy very little tax on both. Secondly, the child company will incur two expenses: the loan repayment expense and the rent for using the IP. These expenses will reduce the taxable income in the onshore jurisdiction, lowering the tax obligations of the child company. This second layer only works for companies that generate a high amount of IP. Most companies will only use the first layer, but the second layer is usually used by STEM companies.
===Third layer===
Companies that are capital intensive, i.e. That use a lot of machinery and physical property etc., can take advantage of a third layer of the Tivot Sandwich. The holding company can own all of the property, plant and equipment of the child company. The child company then rents the PPE from the holding company. This is incurred as an expense which lowers the taxable income and thus lowers the taxation paid. Again, capital gains from selling the PPE go to the holding company. Depreciation and impairment of the assets is recognised on the holding company's income state as an expense, lowering the holding company's taxable income, further lowering its effective tax rate. Coupled with the fact that the Tivot tax rates are so low. At this point the holding company is paying next to nothing in taxes.
===Fourth layer===
In the fourth layer, a trust is set up. The shares of the holding company are owned in whole or part by the trust. The trust is then managed for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The trustee can be the investor or a trusted ally. A beneficiary can be either the investor (if they are not the trustee) or a trusted ally (such as a relative. Trusts pay no taxes. Thus, investors who use this structure pay no taxes for the income generated from the child company.
 
This fourth layer has some challenges. Trusts are limited into the payments that they can make to beneficiaries. A trustee cannot also be a beneficiary. Thus, this layer is used by investors as a way of preventing their dependants (usually their children) from spending all the money when they die and they place the family's assets under a trusted person. Investors who are willing to forego the benefits of the income generated by the trust may find trusts useful as a barrier against taxes, but the fourth layer is only advisable for investors with dependants or who want their money to support a charitable cause.
 
==Case studies==
[[Café Pay]] is a financial services company from [[the Oan Isles]] that provides mobile and online payments. Café Pay generates income in the Oan Isles that it shifts to the Safe Pay Holding Company. Safe Pay is in turn owned by various companies. This takes advantage of UNAC laws allowing companies in different member states to own companies in other member states. The biggest shareholder is Quicksilver Holdings. Quicksilver Holdings is located in a sink OFC specifically [[Blueacia]]. This shows how Tivot acts as a conduit for the final destination of the money which is a sink OFC.
 
Tivot law hides the details of the owners of the Tivot company, but information regarding Quicksilver Holdings was leaked through an investigation by [[Oan News]] in 2015. This demonstrates how Quicksilver took advantage of the Tivot law allowing companies to hide details about their owners.
 
Because Safe Pay is located in Tivot, the IP is recognised by Tivot authorities even though it is registered in the Oan Isles. This builds on the UNAC rule recognising IP from member states. The royalties and capital gains from the IP go to the Safe Pay Holdings Company in Tivot. Thus, Café Pay's income sheet does not show royalties and capital gains as income.
 
== Benefits for Tivot ==
Given that the total taxes paid to the Tivot government are so low, it might seem that the scheme is not beneficial to the country. Tivot benefits from this through the employment of consultants, accountants, lawyers and information technology personnel who maintain and advise on the systems and mechanism required to administer this scheme on behalf of their foreign clients. Furthermore, the government of Tivot still charges various fees that foreign companies are willing to pay due to the fact that taxes and tax avoidance consulting in their own countries is bound to be vastly more expenses than what is paid in fees to the Tivot government. A system like this needs scale to be profitable given the fact that per company income is nevertheless low. Thus, Tivot benefits from the incredibly large number of companies who use its systems. Foreign companies also rent office space. Coupled with the small amount of land available this makes Tivot property highly valuable. Furthermore, Unlike other OFCs, the financial services sector is only one part of their economy together with transshipment and other industries, thus it is not solely dependent on its tax benefits to raise income.