Terism: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  1 month ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 15:
Terism also formed as a central core to what became viewed as Blåskog’s national identity which became highly connected to historical Pan-Ulvrikian movements. With Blåskovian nationalism being focused less on Blåskog as an nation but as simply a state part of the larger Ulvrikian cultural civilisation. Which lead to be inclusive of other national cultures from the larger Ulvrikian world, in contrast to heavier exclusive nationalism in other Ulvrikian nations like [[Norgsveldet]] and [[Kaldrbuth]]. Though this done at the expense of other cultures within East Borea, mainly targeted towards the [[Akuanism|Akuan]] and Duarist groups.
 
In current day Terism remain as a political force in many major political parties and Blåskog’s elite. With the late king Carl IX having identitiesidentified himself as an Terist, with the [[Syrtænzna Dissolution War]] being seen as a clear example of the late king’s Terist policies. Though Terism has evolved from just its purely militaristic and expansionist origins, it has remained an largely imperial and irredentist nationalist ideology.
 
== Principles ==
Moderators, verified
1,580

edits