Template:Infobox: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 February 2006

16 February 2006

  • curprev 00:0700:07, 16 February 2006en>Locke Colem 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original

15 February 2006

14 February 2006

13 February 2006

  • curprev 17:3717:37, 13 February 2006en>Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
  • curprev 13:2113:21, 13 February 2006en>Trödel 1,095 bytes −487 The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that

11 February 2006

  • curprev 23:4423:44, 11 February 2006en>Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
  • curprev 23:3723:37, 11 February 2006en>Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk
  • curprev 00:0900:09, 11 February 2006en>Locke Colem 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel

10 February 2006

6 February 2006

  • curprev 03:0803:08, 6 February 2006en>Locke Colem 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
  • curprev 03:0703:07, 6 February 2006en>Netoholic 1,095 bytes −134 Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
  • curprev 03:0203:02, 6 February 2006en>Locke Cole 1,229 bytes +97 rvt - sigh
  • curprev 02:5902:59, 6 February 2006en>Trödel 1,132 bytes −97 including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them

5 February 2006

4 February 2006

3 February 2006

2 February 2006

1 February 2006

31 January 2006

  • curprev 15:3215:32, 31 January 2006en>Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +450 rvt
  • curprev 15:1315:13, 31 January 2006en>Netoholic 1,132 bytes −450 rmv conditionals. This is "Infobox 101"
  • curprev 13:0213:02, 31 January 2006en>Crotalus horridus 1,582 bytes +450 Conditionals are extremely useful in creating infobox templates. The description is also quite clear.
  • curprev 11:5211:52, 31 January 2006en>Netoholic 1,132 bytes −450 rvt to Trodel - as this is for inexperience template editors, conditionals should be avoided, per talk
  • curprev 09:2709:27, 31 January 2006en>Marknewm 1,582 bytes −6 Correct image tags
  • curprev 07:1307:13, 31 January 2006en>Ligulem 1,588 bytes +456 rv. avoiding conditionals at the cost of template forking is bad. We will have them in MediaWiki anyway
  • curprev 07:0507:05, 31 January 2006en>Trödel 1,132 bytes −456 use of conditionals should be avoided - having an instructional template advocate their use is contraray to that aim
  • curprev 03:0903:09, 31 January 2006en>Crotalus horridus 1,588 bytes +456 Revert - conditionals are very important for infobox design, since there will often be optional parameters.

30 January 2006

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)