Ministry of Culture v. Ministry of the Environment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
== Decision == |
== Decision == |
||
On the 15th of September, 2023, the Tribal Council reached a 5-2-30 decision in favor of the Ministry of Culture. The [[Speaker of Truth]] for the majority opinion, Kiel of the [[Kans]], made an official statement for the 30 Judges:<blockquote>Every ministry has a sui juris, its own jurisdiction over which it solely presides. If a ministry oversteps its sui juris, the people, or other ministries, have the right to challenge that legislation as an overstep of power. From the facts of the case, it is evident that the Ministry of the Environment had no legal standing in passing legislation that prohibited the hunting of non-endangered species. As such, the law prohibiting of the hunting of cetaceans in the Tribal Federation of Kuduk is null and void. |
|||
Additionally, if a case in the future involves a Tribe as either the prosecution or the defense, it is to be immediately raised to the Tribal Council for further hearing.</blockquote> |
|||
== Significance == |
== Significance == |