Esmir: Difference between revisions

Line 174:

[[File:Stuye.jpg|thumb|Mautin Stuye, Former Leader of the Legacy Order]]

Dahorianism is the state philosophy of Esmir. The brand of Dahorianism that meets the particularities of Esmir can sometimes be stylized as Dahorianism-Stuyeism. Adherents of the philosophy believe that the subject of politics is not class, state, nor ego, but ''existence itself'' in therebeing—a conscious reckoning with community, environment, class, and death (neither collective nor individual). From an existential point of view, this makes organized religion important, because it allows for a cultural default to be set in therebeing. However, there is an ontological basis as well. Dahorianists argue that necessary existence relies on some infinite substance and that for something to truly be substantial it has to contribute to negate the negation of direct infinity, meaning that the negation of direct infinity in free will actually contributes to a predetermined outcome. Many contradictions are built upon these positions and negations, which in actuality are one in the same having appeared to the subject as two resulting from the negation. To Dahorianists, the [true] peasant is the archetype of a man that ''is there'' or consciously exists. The peasant seeks self-sufficiency, reckons with his realities, is conscious of his class interest, and tends to be traditional. Tradition is found on the ground as opposed to the cloud of ideas; therebeing reveals the particularities that serve as a basis to tradition, as the purpose of tradition itself is to reckon the people with the realities of the land. Thus, traditionalism most efficiently resolves these contradictions that rear their head everywhere.

Dahorianism is the state philosophy of Esmir. The brand of Dahorianism that meets the particularities of Esmir can sometimes be stylized as Dahorianism-Stuyeism. Adherents of the philosophy believe that the subject of politics is not class, state, nor ego, but ''existence itself'' in therebeing—a conscious person reckoning with community, environment, class, and death (neither collective nor individual). From an existential point of view, this makes organized religion important, because it allows for a cultural default to be set in therebeing. However, there is an ontological basis as well. Dahorianists argue that necessary existence relies on some infinite substance and that for something to truly be substantial it has to contribute to negate the negation of direct infinity, meaning that the negation of direct infinity in free will actually contributes to a predetermined outcome. Many contradictions are built upon these positions and negations, which in actuality are one in the same having appeared to the subject as two resulting from the negation. To Dahorianists, the [true] peasant is the archetype of a man that ''is there'' or consciously exists. The peasant seeks self-sufficiency, reckons with his realities, is conscious of his class interest, and tends to be traditional. Tradition is found on the ground as opposed to the cloud of ideas; therebeing reveals the particularities that serve as a basis to tradition, as the purpose of tradition itself is to reckon the people with the realities of the land. Thus, traditionalism most efficiently resolves these contradictions that rear their head everywhere.

Dahorianists contend with liberalism, cosmopolitanism, and democracy as a whole because these are ''thalassocratic'' and exist only in the ideal. Instead of being rooted in a human reckoning with land, these phenomenon are rooted in the open seas. The sea empire looks to the cloud of ideas as it seeks to grasp at these ideas to find an excuse to impose an open regime on the peoples it conquers, as opposed to a closed regime based on the traditional particularities that must be shared with the conqueror in order for a true incorporation of a peoples to take place in a manner that is at all beneficial to both parties let alone the conqueror. What the sea empire is not conscious of is that it sacrifices its therebeing in the open seas, adopting the fluidity of water in its philosophy and serving as the foundation for oppressive international finance.

@@ Line 174: / Line 174: @@
 {{Main|Dahorianism}}
 [[File:Stuye.jpg|thumb|Mautin Stuye, Former Leader of the Legacy Order]]
-Dahorianism is the state philosophy of Esmir. The brand of Dahorianism that meets the particularities of Esmir can sometimes be stylized as Dahorianism-Stuyeism. Adherents of the philosophy believe that the subject of politics is not class, state, nor ego, but ''existence itself'' in therebeing—a conscious reckoning with community, environment, class, and death (neither collective nor individual). From an existential point of view, this makes organized religion important, because it allows for a cultural default to be set in therebeing. However, there is an ontological basis as well. Dahorianists argue that necessary existence relies on some infinite substance and that for something to truly be substantial it has to contribute to negate the negation of direct infinity, meaning that the negation of direct infinity in free will actually contributes to a predetermined outcome. Many contradictions are built upon these positions and negations, which in actuality are one in the same having appeared to the subject as two resulting from the negation. To Dahorianists, the [true] peasant is the archetype of a man that ''is there'' or consciously exists. The peasant seeks self-sufficiency, reckons with his realities, is conscious of his class interest, and tends to be traditional. Tradition is found on the ground as opposed to the cloud of ideas; therebeing reveals the particularities that serve as a basis to tradition, as the purpose of tradition itself is to reckon the people with the realities of the land. Thus, traditionalism most efficiently resolves these contradictions that rear their head everywhere.
+Dahorianism is the state philosophy of Esmir. The brand of Dahorianism that meets the particularities of Esmir can sometimes be stylized as Dahorianism-Stuyeism. Adherents of the philosophy believe that the subject of politics is not class, state, nor ego, but ''existence itself'' in therebeing—a conscious person reckoning with community, environment, class, and death (neither collective nor individual). From an existential point of view, this makes organized religion important, because it allows for a cultural default to be set in therebeing. However, there is an ontological basis as well. Dahorianists argue that necessary existence relies on some infinite substance and that for something to truly be substantial it has to contribute to negate the negation of direct infinity, meaning that the negation of direct infinity in free will actually contributes to a predetermined outcome. Many contradictions are built upon these positions and negations, which in actuality are one in the same having appeared to the subject as two resulting from the negation. To Dahorianists, the [true] peasant is the archetype of a man that ''is there'' or consciously exists. The peasant seeks self-sufficiency, reckons with his realities, is conscious of his class interest, and tends to be traditional. Tradition is found on the ground as opposed to the cloud of ideas; therebeing reveals the particularities that serve as a basis to tradition, as the purpose of tradition itself is to reckon the people with the realities of the land. Thus, traditionalism most efficiently resolves these contradictions that rear their head everywhere.
 Dahorianists contend with liberalism, cosmopolitanism, and democracy as a whole because these are ''thalassocratic'' and exist only in the ideal. Instead of being rooted in a human reckoning with land, these phenomenon are rooted in the open seas. The sea empire looks to the cloud of ideas as it seeks to grasp at these ideas to find an excuse to impose an open regime on the peoples it conquers, as opposed to a closed regime based on the traditional particularities that must be shared with the conqueror in order for a true incorporation of a peoples to take place in a manner that is at all beneficial to both parties let alone the conqueror. What the sea empire is not conscious of is that it sacrifices its therebeing in the open seas, adopting the fluidity of water in its philosophy and serving as the foundation for oppressive international finance.

Esmir: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Search