Esmir: Difference between revisions

27 bytes added ,  1 month ago
m
Line 178:
Dahorianists contend with liberalism, cosmopolitanism, and democracy as a whole because these are ''thalassocratic'' and exist only in the ideal. Instead of being rooted in a human reckoning with land, these phenomenon are rooted in the open seas. The sea empire looks to the cloud of ideas as it seeks to grasp at these ideas to find an excuse to impose an open regime on the peoples it conquers, as opposed to a closed regime based on the traditional particularities that must be shared with the conqueror in order for a true incorporation of a peoples to take place in a manner that is at all beneficial to both parties let alone the conqueror. What the sea empire is not conscious of is that it sacrifices its therebeing in the open seas, adopting the fluidity of water in its philosophy and serving as the foundation for oppressive international finance.
 
But out of good arises the bad and out of bad arises the good. In this super open post-modernity is rooted a rejection of the open quality itself. For instance, the projects of thalassocracy have inadvertently given rise to great land empires, as is the case with Esmir. Through this inadvertently furnished land spirit, true historicity with the civilization that really exists can be found, and therebeing is pursued.
 
===Administrative divisions===
verified
138

edits