Egendom: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1:
An '''Egendom''' (Cryrian: "Estate") is a term used to refer to a group of large conglomerates dominated by a single family. Each Egendom consists of a wide array of entities that wield significant economic and political power within the Kingdom. The term first entered common use in
Though all
== History ==
The origins of
While the Egendomar lost much of their direct political power as a result of the Cryrian Anarchy and the signing of the 1929 Constitution, they retained their wealth and continued to play an important role in the Cryrian economy. Cooperation between the Egendomar and the Government was seen as essential to the nation's postwar recovery and newly elected administrations were ill-equipped to further combat these heavily entrenched interests, particularly as public opinion on anti-capitalist ideologies soured following schisms among the Cryrian Left and continued insurgency from radical groups. Further, the surviving Egendomar offered a counterweight to the newly empowered labor unions. Throughout much of the 20th century the Government relied upon the cooperation of both the Egendomar and the unions to advise upon and implement industrial and economic policies, thus maintaining an oligopolistic landscape in the Kingdom - Particularly as the unions themselves coalesced into a handful of labor confederations.
The post-Anarchy Egendomar faced their first real political challenge in the mid-20th century when the Tomorrow Ministry began targeting their leading families in an effort to break up the power of these large conglomerates. However, the Ministry's increasingly bold actions against the Cryrian elite and other government agencies ultimately ended in its destruction during the White November Crisis. Though the Egendomar played a key role in generating RIksdag support for the Ministry's dismantling, many of the proposed limits and reforms on their power had proven popular and thus remained in effect. The Egendomar later faced mounting opposition from increasingly progressive Governments throughout the late-20th century, but the absence of determined effort to break them up and a string of favorable electoral results following the Volscine Civil War left them largely intact.
|