Auroran Court of Justice: Difference between revisions
→Treaty enforcement
Line 20:
Where a dispute arises between member states of the UNAC, the parties can bring the dispute to the ACJ. The decision of the ACJ is binding on member states which subject themselves to this process. This process is voluntary but only to the point that the dispute in question does not arise from the violation of treaties and statutes of the UNAC.
=== Treaty enforcement===
Where a member state has violated a treaty or statute of the UNAC, the Prosecutor-General of the UNAC can bring a case against that member state to the ACJ. The decision of the ACJ is binding on the violating country should it be found guilty of treaty violations.
=== Sapient rights protection ===
| |||